The London Explosions + Giuliani + more... : NOLA Indymedia

THE LONDON EXPLOSIONS, THE ROGUE NETWORK, BUSH, AND IRAN

By Webster G. Tarpley

Washington DC, July 11 – Last week’s London explosions carry the characteristic features of a state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks within the British intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office, and the Metropolitan Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider Anglo-American aggressive war in the Middle East, featuring especially an early pre-emptive attack on Iran, with a separate option on North Korea also included. With the London attacks, the Anglo-American invisible government adds another horrendous crime to its own dossier. But this time, their operations appear imperfect, especially in regard to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which, by virtue of its ethnicity, could direct popular anger against one of the invisible government’s targets. So far, the entire attribution of the London crimes depends on what amounts to an anonymous posting in an obscure, hitherto unknown, secular Arabic-language chatrooms in the state of Maryland, USA. But, based on this wretched shred of pseudo-evidence, British Prime Minister Tony Blair – who has surely heard of a group called the Irish Republican Army, which bombed London for more than a decade – has not hesitated to ascribe the murders to “Islam,” and seems to be flirting with total martial law under the Civil Contingencies Act. We are reminded once again of how he earned his nickname of Tony Bliar.

SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE

That the British Government knew in advance that blasts would occur is not open to rational doubt. Within hours of the explosions, Israeli Army Radio was reporting that “Scotland Yard [London police headquarters] had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.” This report, repeated by IsraelNN.com, added that “the Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit.” This report is attributed to “unconfirmed reliable sources.” At around the same time, the Associated Press issued a wire asserting that “British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday’s explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city,” according to “a senior Israeli official.” This wire specifies that “just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say that they had received warnings of possible attacks….”

According to eyewitness reports from London, BBC claimed between 8:45 and some minutes after 10 AM that the incidents in the Underground were the result of an electrical power surge, or alternatively of a collision. Foreign bigwigs, presumably not just Netanyahu, were warned, while London working people continued to stream into the subway. These reports have been denied, repudiated, sanitized, and expunged from news media websites by the modern Orwellian Thought Police, but they have been archived by analysts who learned on 9/11 and other occasions that key evidence in state-sponsored terror crimes tends to filter out during the first minutes and hours, during the critical interval when the controlled media are assimilating the cover story peddled by complicit moles within the ministries. These reports are not at all damaging to Israel, but are devastating for British domestic security organs. An alternative version peddled by Stratfor.com, namely that the Israelis warned Scotland Yard, is most probably spurious but still leaves the British authorities on the hook. Which Scotland Yard official made the calls? Identify that official, and you have bagged a real live rogue network mole.

Another more general element of foreknowledge can be seen in the fact reported by Isikoff and Hosenball of Newsweek that, since about November 2004, the US FBI, but not other US agencies, has been refusing to use the London Underground.

Operations like these are generally conduited through the government bureaucracies under the cover of a drill or exercise which closely resembles the terror operation itself. So it was with Amalgam Virgo and the multiple exercises held on 9/11, as I show in my 9/11 Synthetic Terror – Made in USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive Press, 2005). So it was with the Hinckley attempt to assassinate Ronald Reagan, when a presidential succession exercise was scheduled for the next day, as I showed in my George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992; reprint by Progressive Press, 2004). An uncannily similar maneuver allows the necessary work to be done on official computers and on company time, while warding off the inquisitive glances and questions of curious co-workers at adjoining computer consoles.

THE COVER STORY TERROR DRILL

Such a parallel drill was not lacking in the London case. On the evening of July 7, BBC Five, a news and sports radio program, carried an interview with a certain former Scotland Yard official named Peter Power who related that his firm, Visor Consulting, had been doing an anti-terror-bombing drill in precisely the Underground stations and at the precise times when the real explosions went off. Peter Power and Visor had been subcontractors for the drill; Power declined to name the prime contractors. Small wonder that Blair, in his first official report to the Commons on July 11, went out of his way to rule out a board of inquiry to probe these tragic events.

Tony Blair may be eyeing the advantages of emergency rule for a discredited lame duck like himself, but the British people may have a different view. The alternative is clear: on the one hand is the American response after 9/11, marked by submissive and credulous gullibility in regard to the fantastic official story of what had happened. On the other hand is the militant and intelligent Spanish response after March 11, 2004, marked by powerful mass mobilization and righteous anger against politicians who sought to manipulate the people and sell a distorted account of events. Which way will the British people go? Straws in the wind suggest that the British response may be closer to the Spanish, although it may develop more slowly because of the lack of mass organization and related factors. If this is the case, Tony Blair, Jack Straw, and the rest of the malodorous “New Labor” crypto-Thatcherites will be out the window.

My thesis is that the London explosions represent a form of communication on the past of the transatlantic Anglo-American financier faction with Bush, Blair, and the heads of state and government assembled at Gleneagles, Scotland for the G-8 meeting on the day of the blast. The London deaths were designed to deliver an ultimatum in favor of early war with Iran. Here a word of clarification may be necessary. The demonization of Bush by his many enemies, while understandable, risks blurring the basic realities of power in the US and UK. Since the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy assassination (to go back no further than that), we have been aware of a secret team. During the Iran-contra era, the same phenomenon was referred to as an invisible, secret or parallel government. This is still the matrix of most large-scale terrorism. The questions arises for some: do Bush and Cheney tell the invisible government what to do, or does the invisible government treat the visible office holders as puppets and expendable assets? To ask the question is to answer it: Bush, Cheney & Co. are the expendable puppets. The explanation of terror is not Bush MIHOP, as some seem to argue, but rather invisible government MIHOP, an altogether more dire proposition.

How then does the invisible faction communicate with the public mouthpieces? Given the violence of the power relations involved, we can be sure that it is not a matter of sending out engraved invitations announcing that the honor of Bush’s presence is requested at the launching of an attack on Iran. Rather, the invisible and violent rogue network communicates with Bush, Blair, and others by means coherent with their aggressive nature – as they did on 9/11. Bush, of course, is a weak and passive tenant of the White House whose instinct is to do virtually nothing beyond the day-to-day routine.

We therefore need to note that the London blasts come after two months of vigorous and impatient prodding of Bush by the invisible government. On May 11, a small plane almost reached the White House before it was turned away, while the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House (but not the Pentagon, the Treasury, etc.) were evacuated amid scenes of panic. The White House went to red alert, but Bush was not informed until it was all over, and was riding his bicycle in the woods near Greenbelt, Maryland. Flares were dropped over the Brookland district and Takoma Park, MD. The resemblance of all this to a classic coup scenario was evident. On May 18, a live hand grenade, which turned out to be a dud, landed near Bush as he spoke at a rally in Tbilisi, Georgia.

On June 29, the approach of another small plane led to an evacuation of the Congress and the Capitol, again with scenes of panic. On the afternoon of July 2, no fewer than three small planes came close to Bush’s Camp David retreat in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland; this story was suspiciously relegated to the local news page of the Washington Post. The details of these incidents are of little interest; what counts is the objective reality of a pattern. These incidents also provide background for Bush’s unbalanced behavior on July 5 at Gleneagles, when he crashed into a policeman while riding on his bicycle. Then came the London blasts on July 7.

What is it that the invisible government wants Bush and Blair to do? Scott Ritter announced last January that Bush had issued an order to prepare an attack on Iran for the month of June. According to a well-informed retired CIA analyst I spoke with on July 3, this order actually told US commanders to be ready to attack Iran by the end of June. This project of war with Iran is coherent with most of what we know about the intentions of the US-UK rogue faction, and thus provides the immediate background for the London explosions. The Bush administration and the Blair cabinet have failed to deliver decisive military action, and the invisible government is exceedingly impatient.

One way to increase the pressure on Iran would be to implicate a group of Iranian fanatic patsies in the London bombings. This would not be difficult; in fact, as I show in 9/11 Synthetic Terror, the British capital, referred to during the 1990s as Londonistan, is home to the largest concentration of Arab and Islamic patsy groups in the entire world in such infamous locations as Finsbury mosque and Brixton mosque; these groups are known to have enjoyed de facto recruiting privileges in Her Majesty’s Prisons. But perhaps an Iranian patsy group would be too obvious at this time. More likely may be the sinking of a US warship in the Gulf by a third country, duly attributed to Iran.

In a recent speech, Dr. Ephraim Asculai of Tel Aviv University made two main points: first, that there is no military solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, and second, that there is no such thing as a point of no return in nuclear weapons development. Dr. Asculai showed that South Africa, Sweden, and other nations had turned away from deploying A-bombs well after having acquired the ability to produce them. Dr. Asculai is evidently arguing against widespread tendencies in the US-UK-Israeli strategic community who are whipping up hysteria around the notion that Iran is now indeed approaching exactly such a point of no return.

For her part, Miss Rice of the State Department has now declared that it will no longer be sufficient for Iran to turn away from nuclear weapons production; the entire Iranian program for nuclear energy production will also have to be dismantled, in her view. Such maximalism makes a negotiated solution impossible as long as the current Washington group holds power.

SCO: US GET OUT OF CENTRAL ASIA

The US, UK and Israel have been on the brink of war with Iran for at least a year, and the rogue network is generally aware that time is not on its side. There is also an important new development which threatens the ability of the Anglo-Americans to wage war. On July 5, the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which brings together China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Krygyzia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan plus new members India, Pakistan, and Iran, issued a call for the United States to vacate the bases seized in the autumn of 2001 under the cover of the 9/11 emergency and the looming invasion of Afghanistan. The parties to this call represent about half of the world’s population. This demand was immediately rejected by the State Department, but veteran Russian Eurasian expert Yevgeny Primakov crowed that for the first time a formula had been agreed to by which the US would be ejected from this region. The US presence goes back to the Bush-Putin emergency hotwire talks of September 11, 2001, when Putin, seeing that the madmen had seized control in Washington, dropped Russian objections to a US intrusion into the former Soviet republics of central Asia. The US-UK can attack Iran from Iraq in the west, from Afghanistan in the east, and from Qatar in the south, but without the Uzbek and Kyrgyz bases, the Anglo-American ability to attack from the north as well will be severely limited. The SCO states are also concerned about US-backed “color revolutions” on the recent Georgian and Ukrainian models, traditionally known as CIA “people power” revolutions, being used to destabilize their governments. To make matters worse for Washington and London, Kazakhstan is a few months away from opening an oil pipeline to China, which will diminish the US-UK ability to use their Gulf presence to blackmail Beijing. Washington and London are also dismayed by the pro-Iranian overtures in various fields being made by their Shiite puppets in Baghdad.

And what of the report in the Washington Post of July 11, which claims that US and UK planners are now contemplating a sharp reduction in the US forces in Iraq? The most plausible explanation is that this is pure disinformation, similar to news blips issued by both Hitler and Stalin in May and June of 1941. It should also be noted that the British plan explicitly provides for most of the forces now at Basra to go to Afghanistan, where they would be positioned for operations against Iran, or into central Asia.

Generally, the invisible government appears dismayed by its loss of momentum and the constant erosion of the political position of its asset, Bush. 110,000 US factory workers lost their jobs in June, the worst total in a year and a half: auto and textiles are collapsing. The housing bubble may also be nearing its end, with the bankruptcy of Fannie Mae on the near-term agenda. World derivatives have officially reached $300 trillion, with JP Morgan Chase holding the largest single portfolio. The one virtuoso performance of July 7 was that of the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and European Central Bank, which flooded equity and capital markets with liquidity through such vehicles as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT), turning a big Wall Street loss into a small gain.

During the recent Reopen 9/11 tour of 8 European cities, Jimmy Walter repeatedly forecast that the general predicament of the Bush regime and the US financier faction would lead to another large-scale terror attack before the end of 2005; this has now occurred, and there is no end in sight. The tide of US public opinion has now definitively turned against the Iraq war and to some degree against Bush, as all major polls demonstrate. Notable is the 42% affirmative response to the Zogby International question as to whether, if it could be proved that Bush lied to launch the Iraq war, he should be impeached. Larry Franklin of the Wolfowitz-Feith neocon apparatus has been indicted for divulging US secrets, and the American-Israeli Public Affairs Council has been raided twice; further indictments are expected. Karl Rove has now been revealed as the source of the Valerie Plame leak, making Rove and perhaps other White House officials fair game for federal indictment. The Niger yellowcake forgeries and the Chalabi state secrets cases are still pending – to say nothing of two stolen elections and the 9/11 Septembergate itself. All these factors incline the rogue network to seek an improvement in their situation through a flight forward to a wider war in Iran. Those who stand to lose most by such an Iranian adventure must now mobilize to make Mr. Bush’s second term as eventful as Nixon’s second term turned out to be in 1974.

-------------------------------

http://www.team8plus.org/forum_viewtopic.php?6.366

On 7/7 Rudy Giuliani was in London nearby the attacks, coming from Yorkshire, 200 miles away.
http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=55&ArticleID=1077572
His reason for a visit in London is not established yet.

According to a BBC5 report, the consultancy agency Visor Consultants with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

Mirror:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/090705exercise_clip_2.mp3

Original BBC link (to be open in REAL PLAYER):
rmv8.bbc.net.uk/radio5/drive_thu.ra

There are some claims, that Rudy Giuliani had "past associations" with Power Visor Consultants. I couldn't establish these links yet, however Peter Power might know Richard Sheirer, Giuliani & Partners, because both met on older and forthcoming "world conference of disaster management", as already mentioned in another thread.

Sheirer was former Commissioner of New York City’s Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), which drilled "building collapses" and "plane crashes" prior 9/11, as confirmed by Bernhard Kerik at a May 2004 testimony for the 9/11 panel.

http://wcdm.org/wcdm_advs.html
...

Peter Power
Managing Director, Visor Consultants
United Kingdom

Peter Ryan
Principal Security Advisor, Athens 2004 Olympics
Australia

Richard Sheirer
Senior Vice President, Giuliani & Partners
United States

Here's another ITV video mirror link, with Peter Power (Visor) admitting, live on TV, that they were running terror-bombing exercises ALMOST EXACTLY like what happenened, at the same time:
http://www.terrorize.dk/misc/london/resources.php#terror.games

Direct link (open in Windows Media):
http://www.terrorize.dk/misc/london/london.terror.games.wmv

Blair rules out bomb inquiry
By Jamie Lyons in London
11jul05
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,15889534%255E1702,00.html

BRITISH Prime Minister Tony Blair today will dismiss calls for an inquiry into the London terror attacks...
...The Prime Minister is also expected to chair a meeting of Cobra, the civil contingencies committee..."

NOTE:
One possible related 7/7 test drill (incl. Ray Kelly) had same name:
COBRA (see link above)

The name of committee stands for
Cabinet Office Briefing Room A.K.A. COBRA

http://www.ukresilience.info/role.htm

THE CIVIL CONTINGENCIES SECRETARIAT
The Head of the Civil Contingencies Secretariat is Bruce Mann. He was previously with the Ministry of Defence as Director General Financial Management. Prior to that he served as Director of the MoD's Defence Resources and Plans; he was seconded to NATO headquarters for the Kosovo crisis; and he has been the Director of MoD Defence policy. He was also the Secretary to the Butler Committee...

... The Civil Contingencies Bill became an Act of Parliament on 18 November, 2004. The text of the Civil Contingencies Act:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/20040036.htm

In one article, i learned that "Interxion" runs the main "hub center" for most of the "London Congestion Charge CCTV" program, conducted since february 2003

http://www.spy.org.uk/cgi-bin/cclondon.pl

"...The scheme relies on about 700 CCTV cameras covering around 203 entrances/exits to the 21 square kilometre central zone. Each lane of traffic either entering or leaving the boundary of the zone is covered by a monochrome camera linked to a Automatic Number Plate Recgonition system. Each entry/exit road has at least one colour CCTV camera which streams real time pictures back to the central "Hubsite"..."

http://www.interxion.com/

Since its its foundation in 1998 in netherlands, "the company has raised more than 300 million from major international investors, including Baker Capital, Residex, Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs, CSFB, and Morgan Stanley..."

CEO is Michel Boussard, who came from IBM
Anthony Foy, Group Managing Director, worked at Broadbase Software (now Kana Software)

http://www.kana.com/about/about.aspx
".... KANA partners include Accenture, Aspect, BEA Systems, Broadvision, Cisco, CSC, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, BearingPoint, Microsoft, Remedy and Sun Microsystems...."

Detonation device

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000082&sid=ajy5Mkb...zQ&refer=canada
says that "A remote-controlled detonation would require electronic
communication and is less likely ... Mobile phones could not be used
as a trigger on trains in tunnels, where there is no reception. ...
[But] the use of a timer would have increased the chances of a bomb
being discovered prior to detonation ..."

It's true that an unattended bag in a tube carriage would be noticed.
And tube carriages don't allow you to shove a bag under the seat.
Still, in a packed carriage, a bag on the floor might not be noticed
as not belonging to anyone present. And if the timer had a short fuse, maybe 1 minute, then the bomber could exit the carriage just before the doors closed, with the explosion occurring soon after...

Berkeley "non-explosion" link?

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/325980p-278531c.html
July 7, 2005

"...Nontoxic "tracer gases" were released into the
[NYC]terminal between June 26-30, as scientists from four
national laboratories observed, including physicists
from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in
California...."

Cell Phones, magic

http://www.itv.com/news/index_2062437.html
Sun Jul 10 2005
'Missing'

"...Jamie Gordon, may have been on the bus destroyed in Tavistock Square.
Yvonne said the last that had been heard of her boyfriend was at 9.42am when he phoned his office to say that he was on a bus from Euston to King's Cross.
Mr Gordon's work colleagues have said his mobile phone has been found among the debris of the bus explosion..."

Firefighters NOT at 'explosion' scenes

http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=765372005
"...a small group of dust-covered firefighters took a break from the devastation below.
They are on standby in case of a collapse in the tunnel...
One firefighter, who asked not to be named, said: "There is no rescue operation any more. It is purely body recovery."

Giuliani in London

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1525446,00.html
"...Former Mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, was only yards away from the first explosion and memories of 9/11 quickly came to mind.

'They are a very eerie reminder of 11 September. I was right near Liverpool Street station when the first bombing took place, so I could hear the sirens and then kept hearing reports of different bombing, in different parts of the city..."

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/08/giuliani.london/index.html
"...Giuliani...was staying at a hotel near Liverpool Street Station..."

Investigative Sources:

London Buses, Maps
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/buses/spiders/borough.asp

IRA Comparison

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/october/5/newsid_2492000/2492543.stm

Mastermind "patsie" arrested in November 2001

http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/49640.htm
July 10, 2005

...Mustafa Setmarian Nasar, a Syrian who was the
alleged mastermind behind last year's Madrid train
bombings, has emerged as a key suspect in the London
attack, British sources told The Sunday Times of
London...

[http://www.expatica.com]
September 2004
...Mustafa Setmarian Nasar, a Syrian who lived in
Granada and was head of the al-Qaeda cell in Spain,
was arrested in November 2001...

Netanyahu contradiction

http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=122106240&p=yzzyx68zx
Israel not warned about blasts - foreign minister

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2205
Spinning Netanyahu's London Terror Tip-off

http://tinyurl.com/8bky4
http://www.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,8542,1523131,00.html

Inconsistencies (analysed by Peter Meyer)
"...24 is a pic of
"The bloodstained walls of the British Medical Association in Tavistock Square, which bore the brunt of a bomb that ripped apart a double-decker bus."

13 is a pic with caption:
2A video grab from ITN shows the wreckage of a London bus after an onboard explosion in Tavistock Square."

But 13 seems to show a bus (wrecked) which is not close to any wall..."

Plotline

Plotspeak for first official timeline (later altered)
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/07/london.timeline/

"Prior Knowledge" aka limited hangout

British Police had Received Advanced Warnings of Terrorist Attack
http://globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=657

FBI had 'prior knowledge'
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/07/07/fbi/index.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6514619/site/newsweek

"...fears of terror attacks have prompted FBI agents based in the
U.S. Embassy in London to avoid traveling on London's popular
underground railway (or tube) system...
FBI agents have been known to turn up late to cross-town meetings because they insist on using taxis in London's traffic-choked business center..."

Quinetic ties

Qinetiq, a porton down sub contarctor, and the government's former research agency, "will begin creating computer simulations to show the precise location of where the bombs were planted and direction of the blast."
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1525446,00.html

http://www.QinetiQ.com

QinetiQ, (pronounced ki’ ne tik as in ‘kinetic
energy’) was formed in July 2001 from the larger
part of DERA (Defence Evaluation and Research Agency)
as the first phase of forming a Public Private
Partnership (PPP). It incorporates the bulk of the
MOD’s non-nuclear research, technology and test and
evaluation establishments in its heritage...

'suspects', bogus

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8496293/
"MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the
message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited.
That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said."

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?c_id=2&ObjectID=10335278
11.07.05
"...About 30 al Qaeda fighters and sympathisers have been identified by counter-terrorism officers as the most likely suspects behind the London bombings, The Independent has learnt...
...Another suspect is Mohammed al Gerbouzi, a Moroccan, who is wanted for questioning in connection with attacks in Casablanca and Madrid..."

Abu Hafs al Masri Brigade claims responsibility for London blast
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/050709/w070936.html

NOTE: The credibility of Abu Hafs Brigade lacks, since they also claimed responsibility for the U.S. norteastern power outage in Summer 2003, an assassination plot on Silvio Berlusconi and the the western wildfires in 2003

'suspects', british

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8507035/page/2/

"...A former London police chief, meanwhile, said the bombers were “almost certainly” British subjects, though investigators did not endorse the theory....said John Stevens, who headed London’s Metropolitan Police for five years until retiring in January..."

3 suspects in London probe freed without charge
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-07/11/content_3203633.htm
2005-07-11

Tavistock Symbolism

http://100777.com/node/20
"...The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier (The Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines ) says that most people have built in "slides" that short circuit the mind's critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic. For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy" usually solicits a slide response with many people..."

Underground Train numbers

204, 216, 311

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
08:50 Three bombs in the London Underground explode
within fifty seconds of each other

* One bomb explodes on a Circle Line sub-surface
underground train number 204 eastbound between
Liverpool Street and Aldgate. The explosion took place
100 yards into the tunnel on the third carriage of the
train.

* A second bomb explodes on the second carriage of
a Circle Line sub-surface underground train number 216
westbound at Edgware Road. The explosion on the train
destroys a wall separating two tunnels causing the
wall to collapse onto a train on an adjoining
platform.

* A third bomb explodes on a Piccadilly Line
deep-level underground train number 311 southbound
between King's Cross St. Pancras and Russell Square.
The explosion took place on the first carriage of the
train by the first set of double doors, causing severe
damage to the surrounding tunnel as well.

Visor Clients

http://www.bba.org.uk/bba/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=177&a=342&view=programme
....Their clients in London have included JP Morgan
Chase, ING, Mellon, Lloyds TSB, Morley Fund
Management, Bank of New York, Arcadia Group, FCO and
Universal Music.

Video Sources

Cell Phone video, tube
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/08/AR2005070800642.html

"Witness" oddity reports

Richard Jones

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/berkshire/4663853.stm
Friday, 8 July, 2005, 10:14 GMT 11:14 UK

"...Richard Jones, from Binfield, near Bracknell, Berks,
had got off a bus just before it was blown up in
Tavistock Square on Thursday.
Mr Jones, 61, an IT consultant, has told BBC News he
saw a man acting suspiciously on the bus.
He said the man was fiddling with something in his bag
and seemed in an agitated state..."

Analysis by David Gordon West (UK, China):

Mr Jones, who was forced to take the bus from
Euston after Tube services were suspended,

2 - 9.33am: Passengers told that all underground train
services are being suspended because of a power fault
across the network.

http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/6166798?source=PA

3 -'I heard the bus bomb go off and shuddered - I knew
something terrible had happened'

'The building shook and we heard a muffled thump at
8.50am'
So, how could Mr Jones be forced to take a bus, AFTER
tube services were suspended.

The bus blew up at 8.50am
The tube services were suspended at 9.33am
We have another bullshit witness!!..."

Adam Stacey

Analysis by Ron Wynn:
"...Stacey's photograph of a frightened commuter, shot inside the crippled London Underground."
The picture is of Adam Stacy himself taken by his pal, Eliot.

What isn't a small point is the fact that after leaving Kings Cross he reports that the station lights flickered and as he says it was "thought strange".
Another odditity is that there is no mention of fire. Fight fighters galore but no stories about fighting fires. Just bangs, white & yellow light and smoke, lots of smoke. Come to think of it perhaps there was no combustable material..."

Jamie Gordon

http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/6166798?source=PA

Analysis by David West:
"...Jamie Gordon, who is thought to have been on the bus,
called his office at 9.42.
But the bus was heard to explode at 8.50..."

Trent Morgan

The reason he was being interviewed is because he just happens to have been at the bali bombing as well
http://www.abc.net.au/wa/stories/s1409916.htm

More "EYEWITNESSes":
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/berkshire/4663853.stm

see also:
The London Bombings (by Peter Meier)
http://serendipity.li/london/bombings.htm

False Flag over London (by John Leonard)
http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/16539

London Bombings - An Inside Job (by Steve Watson)
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/07/317861.html
[ Edited Mon Jul 11 2005, 04:35AM ]

Update: UK Metro line run by Bechtel
(*thx to finding by Cpt. Wardrobe)

[today.reuters.co.uk]
http://tinyurl.com/7qlwm

Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:16 AM BST

"...Tube Lines is a joint venture between specialist public services provider Amey and U.S. private industrial firm Bechtel ... instead of ... Tube Lines is a three-way joint venture between specialist public services provider Amey, U.S. private industrial firm Bechtel and facilities management firm Jarvis...
(corrects to show Jarvis is no longer a co-owner)....

...Metronet operates about two thirds of the capital city's underground train lines, and Tube Lines the remainder...

...Tube Lines is a joint venture between specialist public services provider Amey and U.S. privately held industrial firm Bechtel. The group has a 30-year public/private partnership (PPP) contract to 2032 to operate the Northern, Jubilee and Piccadilly lines...

...Metronet is a consortium of Bombardier Transport, Balfour Beatty, Thames Water, Seeboard and WS Atkins.

It operates the Bakerloo, Central, Circle, District, East London, Hammersmith & City, Metropolitan, Victoria and Waterloo & City lines..."

Richard Sheirer's name (Giuliani + Partners) removed from Disaster event with Peter Power (Visor)

You can still see him in a cache:
[72.14.207.104]
http://tinyurl.com/9hs6g

original link:
http://wcdm.org/wcdm_advs.html
(also not available in web.archive.org)

...UPDATES continue at
http://www.team8plus.org/forum_viewtopic.php?6.366.10

Brad
http://911review.org

Tagmaster contracted with Motorola to work on the TUBE prior to the attacks. It specifically was to work on a system for tracking the trains while they were underground. Thus, timers were not needed if insider job theory has merit.

" timers were not needed"

True, all that was needed was a moslem...

good finding.

Here seems to be a confirmation on that:

http://www.tagmaster.com/applications/transportation/examples.php

Onboard Management
London Underground - Enabling an on-board train radio
to automatically change talk-group, when moving
between areas on the underground network. The reader
is positioned under the train cab and the ID-tag is
fitted to a bracket, mounted on the sleepers between
the rails. This so called "beacon system" formed part
of requirements for a new Motorola TETRA radio system
for London Underground. The heavy-duty enclosure
ensures that the demanding environmental requirements
for this train-mounted RFID solution are fulfilled.

Traffic and Passenger Information
Pearl Line Light rail - To improve the accuracy of the
traffic information, the ATC Group has installed
automatic passenger train identification equipment.
This uses TagMaster RFID readers at the entrance and
exit of commuter train stations. TagMaster tags are
mounted at the front and rear of each train, for
precise traffic monitoring..."